CO129-296 - Public Offices & Others - 1899 — Page 421

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Series Prev Next

DOMESTIC

HONG KONG

No 2/356

(Subject.)

21356 415

RECO

REG 12 AUG 39

or Individual,

klich CC.

1899

Pensio

11 any

previous Paper.

Copy

31 Aug

IL(73)~12054-1506G-12~R

alsequent Paper.

$995

further reap his claim to adda for

professional qualifications

Mr. Lucas

the

(Minutes.)

pointing

then first

refl that he did not render service as required for which entitled him

mam.

an addition of years for professional qualifications; and that he therefore regrets that he cannot reconsider the decision conveyed in

letter of 19/09/76; this decision is

M-Wilson

final

16/0

din his Udd that

A. F. 15/8

I think we must answer as proposed? CPZ17

Edit History

2026-05-31 15:53:32 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

DOMESTIC HONG KONG No 2/356 (Subject.) 21356 415 RECO Ox REG 12 AUG 39 or Individual, klich CC. 1899 Pensio 11 any previous Paper. Copy 31 Aug IL(73)~12054-1506G-12~R alsequent Paper. $995 further reap his claim to adda for professional qualifications Mr. Lucas the to (Minutes.) pointing then first refl that he did not render service as required for which entitled him mam. an addition of years for professional qualifications; and that he therefore regrets that he cannot reconsider the decision conveyed in letter of 19/09/76; this decision is M-Wilson final 16/0 din his Udd that A. F. 15/8 I think we must answer as proposed? CPZ17

Baseline (Original)

DOMESTIC HONG KONG No 2/356 (Subject.) 21356 415 RECO Ox REG 12 AUG 39 or Individual, klich CC. 1899 Pensio 11 any previous Paper. Copy 31 Aug IL (73)~12054-1506G-12~R alsequent Paper. $995 further reap his claim to adda for professional qualifications Mr. Lucas the to (Minutes.) pointing then first refl that he did not renter asi requidad ffa whichcntitled hem mam. an addition of years for professional qualifications; and that the 5 of 5. therefore regrets that he cannot reconsider the decision converged in letter of y/o 190976! this decision is M-Wilson final 16/0 din his Udd that A. F. 15/8 I think we must answer as as proposed? CPZ17

2026-05-31 15:53:32 · Baseline

View content